Global Resistance to Existing Power Structures for AP World History

After World War II, organized groups began fighting injustice in their countries. Some leaders, such as Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King Jr., used nonviolent strategies, while others, such as Shining Path and Al-Queda, were violent. Meanwhile, militarized governments and dictators fought threats to their power with state violence. Read the Google Slides to learn about global resistance to existing power structures.

Illustrative Examples

Chile under Augusto Pinochet

Spain under Francisco Franco

Uganda under Idi Amin

The Buildup of the Military-Industrial Complex and Weapons Trading

Shining Path

Al-Qaeda

Nonviolent Responses to Injustice

Nonviolent responses to injustice have been powerful tools for social change, exemplified by iconic figures like Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Nelson Mandela. Gandhi, known for his philosophy of nonviolent resistance, employed civil disobedience and peaceful protests to challenge British colonial rule in India, ultimately leading to the nation’s independence. Similarly, Martin Luther King Jr. utilized nonviolent tactics such as boycotts and marches to combat racial segregation and discrimination in the United States, advocating for civil rights and equality for African Americans. Nelson Mandela, in his fight against apartheid in South Africa, embraced nonviolence as a means to dismantle institutionalized racism and achieve democracy, inspiring a global movement for justice and reconciliation. Through their unwavering commitment to nonviolent activism, these leaders demonstrated the transformative power of peaceful resistance in the face of oppression and injustice.

Mohandas Gandhi

Gandhi’s strategic implementation of nonviolent resistance stands as a hallmark of India’s journey to independence from British colonial rule. Through his philosophy of satyagraha, or truth force, Gandhi mobilized millions of Indians in a united front against British oppression. His approach encompassed peaceful protests, civil disobedience campaigns, and boycotts, all aimed at challenging unjust laws and policies enforced by the British authorities. Gandhi’s Salt March in 1930, where he led thousands on a 240-mile journey to defy the salt tax, became a symbol of resistance and garnered international attention. Despite facing violence and imprisonment, Gandhi’s unwavering commitment to nonviolence inspired hope and unity among the Indian masses, ultimately contributing to India’s liberation in 1947. Gandhi’s legacy of nonviolent resistance continues to resonate globally as a potent force for social and political change.

Martin Luther King Jr.

Martin Luther King Jr. employed nonviolent tactics as a powerful weapon in the battle against segregation and racial injustice in the United States. Inspired by the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi and his own Christian faith, King advocated for civil rights through peaceful protests, marches, and boycotts. His leadership during the Montgomery Bus Boycott in 1955, sparked by Rosa Parks’ refusal to give up her bus seat, propelled him to the forefront of the civil rights movement. King’s stirring speeches, including his iconic “I Have a Dream” address during the March on Washington in 1963, galvanized millions and brought attention to the plight of African Americans. Despite facing hostility, arrests, and violence, King remained committed to nonviolence, believing that love and moral persuasion could overcome hatred and injustice. His efforts culminated in legislative victories such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which dismantled legal segregation and expanded voting rights for African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr.’s legacy as a champion of nonviolent resistance continues to inspire movements for equality and justice worldwide.

Nelson Mandela

Nelson Mandela, the iconic leader of the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa, exemplified the power of nonviolent resistance in the struggle against racial oppression. Mandela’s commitment to nonviolence was evident throughout his activism, despite facing immense brutality and persecution under the apartheid regime. His leadership in the African National Congress (ANC) included acts of civil disobedience, boycotts, and peaceful protests aimed at challenging the unjust laws of apartheid and advocating for equality. However, Mandela’s unwavering dedication to nonviolent means did not spare him from the harsh realities of apartheid-era justice. In 1964, he was sentenced to life imprisonment for his anti-apartheid activities, enduring 27 years of incarceration, much of it spent in the notorious Robben Island prison. Despite being confined to a small cell, Mandela remained steadfast in his commitment to nonviolence, using his time in prison to reflect, educate, and organize resistance against apartheid. His remarkable resolve and moral courage inspired a global movement for his release and brought international attention to the injustice of apartheid. Mandela’s eventual release in 1990 marked a turning point in South Africa’s history, leading to negotiations that culminated in the dismantling of apartheid and the country’s transition to democracy. Throughout his life, Nelson Mandela’s advocacy for nonviolence and reconciliation served as a guiding light for oppressed people around the world, demonstrating the transformative power of peaceful resistance in the face of tyranny and injustice.

Authoritarian Regimes

Militarized nations, characterized by authoritarian regimes and a heavy emphasis on military power, often respond to conflicts with brutal repression and human rights abuses. Leaders like Augusto Pinochet in Chile, Idi Amin in Uganda, and Francisco Franco in Spain ruled with an iron fist, using their military forces to suppress dissent and maintain control. Pinochet’s regime, for example, was notorious for its use of torture, disappearances, and extrajudicial killings to quash political opposition. Similarly, Amin’s regime in Uganda was marked by widespread violence and persecution, particularly targeting ethnic and political minorities. Franco’s dictatorship in Spain relied on military force to suppress regional autonomy movements, most notably in Catalonia and the Basque Country. Additionally, militarized nations often engage in weapons trading and arms races, contributing to the proliferation of conflict and instability globally. The military-industrial complexes within these countries profit from the production and sale of weapons, fueling conflicts and perpetuating cycles of violence. The legacy of militarized nations is one of oppression, violence, and exploitation, highlighting the devastating consequences of unchecked military power and authoritarian rule.

Augusto Pinochet

Augusto Pinochet, a prominent figure in Chilean history, rose to power through a military coup in 1973 that overthrew the democratically elected government of President Salvador Allende. Pinochet’s regime marked a dark chapter in Chilean history, characterized by widespread human rights violations, political repression, and economic instability. Under his authoritarian rule, the military assumed control of the government, dismantling democratic institutions and suppressing opposition through censorship, intimidation, and violence. Pinochet’s regime targeted perceived enemies of the state, including political dissidents, activists, and intellectuals, many of whom were subjected to torture, disappearances, and extrajudicial killings. Despite his regime’s brutal tactics, Pinochet implemented neoliberal economic policies that attracted support from conservative sectors and foreign investors. However, his authoritarian rule and human rights abuses ultimately led to widespread condemnation both domestically and internationally. Pinochet’s legacy continues to divide Chilean society, with ongoing debates over his regime’s impact on the country’s political and social landscape.

Francisco Franco

Francisco Franco, the Spanish dictator who ruled from 1939 until his death in 1975, wielded significant power over Spain’s military throughout his regime. Emerging victorious from the Spanish Civil War, Franco established a totalitarian regime characterized by repression, censorship, and authoritarian rule. He centralized power within the military, ensuring its loyalty through extensive purges and the establishment of a pervasive surveillance state. The military became a pillar of Franco’s regime, with key positions occupied by loyalists who enforced his policies and suppressed dissent. Under Franco’s leadership, Spain remained politically isolated, but the regime maintained stability through strict control over the military and other institutions. Franco’s death in 1975 led to a transition to democracy, but his legacy continues to influence Spanish politics and society today.

Idi Amin

Idi Amin’s regime in Uganda, from 1971 to 1979, was marked by brutal military control and widespread human rights abuses. Amin, a former military officer, seized power in a coup and quickly consolidated authority, relying heavily on the military to maintain his grip on power. His rule was characterized by arbitrary arrests, torture, and extrajudicial killings perpetrated by security forces loyal to him. Amin’s military, known for its brutality and corruption, played a central role in enforcing his authoritarian regime and suppressing dissent. Under his leadership, Uganda descended into chaos and violence, leading to economic collapse and widespread suffering. Amin’s brutal regime was eventually overthrown in 1979, but the scars of his military dictatorship continue to haunt Uganda’s history.

The Military Industrial Complex

The military-industrial complex, a term coined by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his farewell address in 1961, refers to the close relationship between the military establishment, defense contractors, and government policymakers. This complex often results in the production and trading of weapons on a large scale. Defense contractors, driven by profit motives, produce and sell advanced weaponry to governments and military forces around the world. This lucrative trade in arms fuels conflicts and perpetuates militarization, leading to destabilization in various regions. Moreover, the influence of defense contractors on government policy can lead to increased military spending and the prioritization of military solutions to international conflicts. The military-industrial complex has been criticized for promoting war and violence while detracting from investments in social welfare and economic development.

Violence Against Citizens

Groups willing to target civilians to advance their political or ideological objectives often espouse extremist ideologies rooted in radicalism, fanaticism, or religious fundamentalism. These ideologies typically reject peaceful means of achieving change and instead prioritize violence as a tool to challenge existing power structures or impose their beliefs on others. Such groups may perceive civilians as legitimate targets in their struggle, viewing them as representatives of the system they seek to dismantle or as obstacles to their ideological goals. The ideologies driving these groups often prioritize the attainment of their objectives above ethical or moral considerations, leading to indiscriminate violence and disregard for human life. In pursuit of their aims, these groups may exploit grievances, real or perceived, within marginalized communities or exploit religious or cultural identities to recruit supporters and justify their actions. Overall, the ideology of such groups is marked by extremism, intolerance, and a willingness to use violence against innocent civilians to achieve their ends.

Shining Path

Shining Path, also known as the Communist Party of Peru (Sendero Luminoso), is a Maoist insurgent group that emerged in Peru in the late 20th century. Founded by Abimael Guzmán in 1980, Shining Path aimed to overthrow the Peruvian government and establish a communist state through armed revolution. The group employed violent tactics, including bombings, assassinations, and massacres, targeting government officials, security forces, civilians, and even rival leftist organizations. Shining Path’s brutal campaign resulted in tens of thousands of deaths and widespread fear and instability across Peru. Despite being significantly weakened by government crackdowns in the 1990s, remnants of the group continue to operate in remote regions of Peru, albeit on a much smaller scale.

Al-Qaeda

Al-Qaeda, a global militant Islamist organization, gained notoriety for its role in orchestrating the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States. Founded by Osama bin Laden in the late 1980s, Al-Qaeda seeks to establish a pan-Islamic caliphate governed by its interpretation of Sharia law. The group espouses a violent ideology that justifies targeting civilians and non-Muslims to achieve its political and religious objectives. Al-Qaeda has carried out numerous attacks worldwide, including bombings, assassinations, and hostage-taking operations. Its decentralized structure and ability to recruit members from diverse backgrounds make it a formidable and elusive adversary for counterterrorism efforts. Despite the death of Osama bin Laden in 2011 and significant setbacks in the subsequent years, Al-Qaeda remains active in various regions, posing a persistent threat to global security.

Would you rather watch a video on global resistance to existing power structures?

Unit 8: Cold War and Decolonization

AP World History

#APWorldHistory